Q & A

House destroyed in 2007.

The Planning Dept. held their second public workshop on Infill Thursday evening. Our Infill Study Go-To guy, Travis, did a good job of walking through the mine-field. FP learn a lot about Planning and Land Use terms and tools. The model he used showing the effect of various regulatory instruments was quite revealing. Of the 10 examples of what someone could build, the building envelope for Raleigh was pretty much full lot coverage with side setbacks of 5 and 10 feet. And, or course, Raleigh has one of the most generous heights in the county -- 40 ft to midline, not top, of the roof. Our neighbors in Apex and Cary are in the 30s.

Many questions were asked, and some feisty discussions took place. One question which keeps arising is why "people" assume that it is just "builders" who want property rights protected? And why, for heavens sake, are builders identified as the problem here?

Would someone like to take that question on?

Clue: If you do a search for property holdings by prominent members of the Renewal campaign, you may have to connect the dots to get the full story, but the holdings and sales are significant.

Fallonia has a question: how many of these neighborhood changes are driven by speculation and how many by a current homeowner? Isn't that the key difference between today's trends and trends of the recent past based on homeowner improvements?

What if this is about an emerging business model built on the loopholes in the zoning ordinances, which were designed for new development the 50s? RR can say it over and over, this is just about homeowner's rights, but it does not make it so. This is about cities catching up their zoning ordinances to current realities, to make sure these codes reflect the will of the City about who that City is. 

The city is allowing its once thriving neighborhoods to do hand to hand combat over the future of Our Town.

The combatants are, on one hand, the residents who bought and maintained their home in older neighborhoods because they love the ambiance of older neighborhoods. They are fighting to preserve their investment on the ground. And they have paid for that right through years of higher valuations.

The other side is fighting about the right to profit off investments. This is called speculation, no matter what the commodity.

Now, in Fallonia's world, if one group is fighting to keep from losing something valuable and irreplaceable, and the other side is fighting for the right to profit from something, you are looking at a winners and losers equation no matter how it is sliced and diced.

Such a pity ... this could have been a boon for everyone involved. The City owes it to ALL of its investors (is not the burden of support on the backs of property owners) to provide guidance through this in a timely manner. We are on the verge of messing things up for the people who live here -- big time. And that, my friends, will be a permanent loss, and the City will have to clean that up. 

How to Say ... It's a Problem

A Fine Reason to Go to Oakwood Tonight

Preservation Calendar
Raleigh -- Community Conversations Series With Adrian Fine
TALKS

Wednesday, May 28, 2008 @ 07:00 PM

Community Conversations Series
Adrian Fine, National Trust for Historic Preservation
The National Trust's teardown guru discusses how lessons from around the country can be applied to Raleigh.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 7:00-9:00 pm,
St. Augustine's College Chapel, 1315 Oakwood Avenue, Raleigh
Free and open to the public
Sponsored by the Raleigh Historic Districts Commission and Preservation NC

If you have not noticed, the momentum is gathering around the issue of what is good infill and what is a problem. Tonight Raleigh has a rare opportunity to hear -- from the National Trust for Historic Preservation -- what they have learned around the country. Yes, this is not just a local problem, and by bringing in a larger perspective, Raleigh has a chance to learn how to balance growth and preservation – before it is too late.

NCOD Needs You

I think we need to be real careful about making such a sweeping change. Just like the mortgage industry found out by making loans too easy, these things can backfire and mess things up.

—Planning Commissioner who expressed concern that one vote per property owner was not fair for people who own multiple properties in a neighborhood.

Official Agenda – 

May 27, 2008, 9:00 AM

City of Raleigh Planning Commission
Room 201, City Council Chambers, Avery Upchurch Municipal Complex

1. INVOCATION
2. OLD BUSINESS

A. TEXT CHANGE COMMITTEE REPORT
1. TC-3-08 – Heliports

2. TC-4-08 – Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District

B. STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT
1. Z-15-08 – Lake Boone Trail, north side, west and east of Landmark Drive intersection, Conditional Use **(Crabtree) VSPP – Request for 30-day Time Extension

C. DEFERRED ITEMS
    1. *Z-6-08 – Capital Boulevard, east, north of Jacqueline Drive, Conditional Use **(Neuse) VSPP
    2. Z-7-08 – Louisburg Road, west side, south of Perry Creek Road intersection, Conditional Use **(Neuse) – Request for 60-day Time Extension
    3. Z-21-08 – Louisburg Road, north side, between Ligon Mill and Forestville Roads, Conditional Use **(Neuse and Tom’s Creek)

3. NEW BUSINESS
A. PUBLIC HEARING (9:30 AM)
    1. SP-117-01 – Grace Christian School/Hope Community Church (Revision to approved plan)
    2. SP-116-07 – Aldert Root Elementary School
    3. S-15-08 – JC Murray Subdivision (Infill)
    4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES –May 13, 2008 Planning Commission Meeting

5. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Report from the Chair
B. Report from the Members
C. Report from the City Attorney
D. Report from the Planning Director
E. Committee Agenda Items

6. ADJOURNMENT

Property Valuations

Remember when the new valuations came out -- who doesn't -- and the dismay of those who saw their valuations double, based on the redevelopment activity in their neighborhood, were told that Wake County and Raleigh would probably drop the tax rate to ease the pain?

Tax bite may get more painful
Across the Triangle, counties and cities are considering property tax increases to make up revenue shortfalls

MICHAEL BIESECKER AND DAVID BRACKEN, Staff Writers

In Raleigh, City Manager Russell Allen has asked the city council for a 15 percent property tax increase, the largest in more than a decade. The boost would come on the heels of a 15 percent increase in water and sewer rates.

Durham City Manager Patrick Baker wants a nearly 11 percent increase on his municipal tax rate. The city council has already approved a tiered water rate schedule that will boost the average bill by about one-third.

Town Manager Roger Stancil of Chapel Hill also wants an 11 percent hike.

Wake and Durham counties -- both of which are contemplating tax increases -- just completed property revaluations, meaning many homeowners will get walloped with both higher property values and tax increases.

While the news story was saying that the combined Wake and Raleigh increases would cost homeowners $150 per $200,000, the underlying truth is that an ITB modest home probably just went from $300,000 to $600,000. So, according to Fallonia's cracker-jack math education, take your last tax bill, double it, and then add the new rate on top. The rate increase is the least of our worries.

More about this at the links in the Reader Feeder. News & Observer story here.

• CONTACT INFORMATION
• Raleigh City Council: 890-3050 or www.raleigh-nc.org.
• Wake County Board of Commissioners: (919) 856-6160 or wakegov.org.
• Durham City Council: 560-4396 or 4333 or www.ci.durham.nc.us
• Orange County Board of Commissioners: 968-4501, 732-8181 or www.co.orange.nc.us
• Chapel Hill Town Council: 968-2743 or www.townofchapelhill.org
• Carrboro Town Council: 942-8541 or www.ci.carrboro.nc.us
  

A Fable for Our Time

The Zax by Dr. Seuss.

The Most Important Meeting You Can Attend This Year

Is Your Neighborhood on this Map?

RALEIGH, NC | Infill
If your neighborhood is not on this map, then development activities in your neighborhood are bound only by city-wide zoning ordinances, which treat property the same for established neighborhoods and raw land. This means, for example, a home can be built to a maximum height of 40 feet to the midline of the roof. Couple this with a home built to maximum setbacks and the house next door may take on renewed significance in your neighborhood.

Raleigh Planning Department to the Rescue

The Planning Department will host the second public meeting regarding residential infill construction on Thursday, May 29. The meeting will be held in the City Council chambers in the Avery Upchurch Municipal Complex (room 201). The meeting will begin at 7 p.m., and will focus on the results of the visual preference survey and nationwide best management practices. Please come to the meeting and make your opinions known!

They are not kidding. If you do not come to the meeting, they cannot hear you. If you are a resident of an established neighborhood and wish to have input on the future of your investment, this is the best opportunity for you to be a part of this discussion.

Did I mention this is the only formal invitation to shape this debate that you will be getting?